LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: pinyin
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Thu Jul 31 12:49:34 CEST 2008
Peter Constable wrote:
> my initial reaction to the proposal is that having
> "zh-Latn" as the prefix in each case is fine.
We have no Suppress-Script for variants, and it would
be confusing to introduce this "feature" in a 4646bis:
Variant Suppress-Script beating main Suppress-Script
or a similar rule can't be clear. The prefix is okay,
adding more prefixes for other zh-languages when they
will be registered is possible.
More information about the Ietf-languages