LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION FORM

[Frank Ellermann]

Addison Phillips wrote:

> In practice, I think we should mostly follow what ISO does, but it is 
> NOT a requirement and this is one of the types of cases for which it
> was envisioned.

Speed reading 4646, yes, it's not forbidden to do it *here*.  A lack
of vision on my side, it never occured to me to tackle the old "mis" 
description *here*.  Is that a good idea ?  The registry isn't the
only user of ISO 639, the gsw fix deserves to be in the source, not
only in the registry.

 Frank