LANGUAGE SUBTAG MODIFICATION FORM
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Thu Jan 10 00:48:06 CET 2008
Addison Phillips wrote:
> In practice, I think we should mostly follow what ISO does, but it is
> NOT a requirement and this is one of the types of cases for which it
> was envisioned.
Speed reading 4646, yes, it's not forbidden to do it *here*. A lack
of vision on my side, it never occured to me to tackle the old "mis"
description *here*. Is that a good idea ? The registry isn't the
only user of ISO 639, the gsw fix deserves to be in the source, not
only in the registry.
More information about the Ietf-languages