Stop requiring endonyms

Lang Gérard gerard.lang at
Fri Dec 12 17:32:03 CET 2008

Dear Randy,

Thank you very much for your message that clearly states that only point 4 of my message is "off-topic", so that the three others, not being off-topic" are considered as "in-topic".
Gérard LANG 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : ietf-languages-bounces at [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at] De la part de Randy Presuhn
Envoyé : vendredi 12 décembre 2008 16:47
À : ietf-languages at
Objet : Re: Stop requiring endonyms

Hi -

> From: "Lang Gérard" <gerard.lang at>
> To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at>; "John Cowan" 
> <cowan at>; "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer at>
> Cc: <ietf-languages at>
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 3:01 AM
> Subject: RE: Stop requiring endonyms (Was: RFC 4645bis: making 
> 'pes'and'prs'extlangs/// Better use autonyms

> 4-This is (one of the reason) why ISO 639-4, that will be giving the 
> general methodology to build ISO 639 code elements should be precise 
> about these questions.
> Bien cordialement.
> Gérard LANG

This discussion has wandered far off-topic for ietf-languages at
Please take it elsewhere.


Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list