Michael Everson everson at
Wed Aug 27 18:58:27 CEST 2008

On 27 Aug 2008, at 16:40, Ihar Mahaniok wrote:

> Was 1959 revision more important than 1933 and 2008 revisions?
> And, the problem I see with this proposal is that it is unclear (from
> the tag itself) whether it is supposed to cover 2008 revision as well
> or not.

In my opinion if there is only to be ONE subtag for this it should be  
for the one that you could make a spell-checker or Wikipedia with. I'd  
have no problem with three of them, if each pointed to an  
authoritative dictionary or grammar.

Michael Everson *

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list