acade - LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
yury.tarasievich at gmail.com
Wed Aug 27 18:11:26 CEST 2008
Ihar Mahaniok wrote:
> Was 1959 revision more important than 1933 and 2008 revisions?
> And, the problem I see with this proposal is that it is unclear (from
> the tag itself) whether it is supposed to cover 2008 revision as well
> or not.
Obviously, it does not cover 2008 revision, which is yet to be
introduced in 2010.
More information about the Ietf-languages