4646bis era

Randy Presuhn randy_presuhn at mindspring.com
Tue Aug 26 08:50:49 CEST 2008

Hi Frank -

> From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
> To: <ietf-languages at alvestrand.no>
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:31 PM
> Subject: Re: 4646bis era
> John Cowan wrote:
> > For this purpose we don't need the RFC to be published.
> > ietf-languages entered the 4646 epoch as soon as the
> > RFC was accepted and the new registry set up.
> There was also the business of "finding" a volunteer for
> the job of an expert language *subtag* registry reviewer.
> The existing language *tag* reviewer had to agree to this
> redefinition of his job, and the IESG had to appoint him.
> And there was a bunch of appeals at different levels (IAB
> and IESG), that's why I mentioned "approval + sixty days"
> to sort stuff like this out.
> IIRC one of the appeals was about the right hand side of
> the address of this list, another about a fixed typo in
> the RFC, a third about posting rights on this list or on
> the LTRU list, and so on ad nauseam.
>  Frank

So, please, are you planning an appeal or not?

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list