Modification Request: frr (Suppress-Script: Latn)
mark.davis at icu-project.org
Wed Oct 3 21:32:25 CEST 2007
You spoke of two conditions for adding SS, but the spec only has the first
1. If these languages are overwhelmingly written in the Latin script
(using whatever criteria we use to define "overwhelmingly"), and
2. if there is a non-trivial amount of material in these languages
already tagged with a language-plus-region tag,
3. then the S-S entries should be added.
The second is not a requirement, and thus not a reason for rejection.
On 10/2/07, Doug Ewell <dewell at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
> >> I picked seven missing Suppress-Scripts for languages used in or near
> >> Germany, that should conclude this business for (modern) Sorbian,
> >> Frisian, nds, and gsw.
> > And the other thousands of languages you just don't care about?
> He probably doesn't consider himself qualified to make a judgment about
> them. Better to speak on what one knows.
> If these languages are overwhelmingly written in the Latin script (using
> whatever criteria we use to define "overwhelmingly"), and if there is a
> non-trivial amount of material in these languages already tagged with a
> language-plus-region tag, then the S-S entries should be added. I
> suspect that some of these languages will not pass the second test.
> Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ <http://users.adelphia.net/%7Edewell/>
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages