Konkani Suppress-Script

[Mark Davis]

I think there is sufficient overlap among the groups that the issues can
effectively be discussed in the LTRU group, which is the one that makes the
rules that we follow here.

Mark

On 10/1/07, Doug Ewell <dewell at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>
> Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> had written:
>
> >> I also propose having this list draw up some rather specific
> >> operational guidelines for adding or not adding, and removing or not
> >> removing, Suppress-Script fields, and posting these guidelines in a
> >> publicly available location.
> >
> > Why "this list" and not the LTRU list?
>
> Because this is the list that is tasked with interpreting and
> implementing the rules set out in RFC 4646, and this is the list where
> the battles are always fought concerning whether this or that
> Suppress-Script should be added or removed.  The rule "overwhelmingly"
> is well understood in LTRU, but putting the rule into practice is our
> responsibility over here.
>
> However, Randy has stated (as LTRU co-chair) that he believes it belongs
> in LTRU, so I guess that settles it.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>



-- 
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20071001/dfbe5929/attachment.html