Registration request: "mis" comment clarifying meaning
Doug Ewell
dewell at adelphia.net
Sat May 12 23:36:50 CEST 2007
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> The ISO 639 JAC has been discussing 'mis' and it's likely that some
> change will be made to clarify the intended purpose, including a
> change to the name property. So, it probably makes sense to hold off
> any changes for this ID in the LSTR.
What is the estimated timeline for ISO 639 JAC to finalize these
"post-preliminary" changes to the code list? I'm asking from the
standpoint of using them to generate a new draft-4645bis.
(Before anyone points out that I can always write a draft and change it
later, because integers are cheap, remember that draft-4645bis requires
generating a huge code list from the 639-3 data and manually merging it
with the existing Registry. It's not a trivial effort and I'd rather do
it at points of reasonable stability.)
--
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list