Registration request: "mis" comment clarifying meaning
randy_presuhn at mindspring.com
Sat May 12 19:58:20 CEST 2007
> From: "John Cowan" <cowan at ccil.org>
> To: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>
> Cc: <ietf-languages at iana.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Registration request: "mis" comment clarifying meaning
> My personal view is that there is no point in acting on this request.
> 4646bis will have better instructions about when to use 'mis', and
> the 639/RA-JAC is probably going to rearrange things anyhow.
> At the moment, the less we commit to the better.
I heartily agree.
More information about the Ietf-languages