Status?

[Michael Everson]

At 13:13 -0400 2007-03-20, CE Whitehead wrote:
>>At 08:08 -0700 2007-03-20, Mark Crispin wrote:
>>
>>>If the intent of the question mark is to suggest approximation, 
>>>then "(before c.1606)" would accomplish that.  However, in the 
>>>context, it seems to be that the problem is with "before"; the 
>>>describing documents are dated 1606, hence simply "(c.1606)" 
>>>should do.
>>
>>I think it is "(to c. 1606)".
>>Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
>Thanks, Mike, that is it.

Please do not call me "Mike".
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com