Michael Everson everson at
Tue Mar 20 18:17:17 CET 2007

At 13:13 -0400 2007-03-20, CE Whitehead wrote:
>>At 08:08 -0700 2007-03-20, Mark Crispin wrote:
>>>If the intent of the question mark is to suggest approximation, 
>>>then "(before c.1606)" would accomplish that.  However, in the 
>>>context, it seems to be that the problem is with "before"; the 
>>>describing documents are dated 1606, hence simply "(c.1606)" 
>>>should do.
>>I think it is "(to c. 1606)".
>>Michael Everson *
>Thanks, Mike, that is it.

Please do not call me "Mike".
Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list