[Ltru] RE: (iso639.2708) RE: ISO 639-2 decision: "mis"

Martin Duerst duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Jun 20 07:17:02 CEST 2007

At 04:16 07/06/20, Mark Davis wrote:
>And frankly, if you are going to the trouble to tag content that you're going to later revisit, you'd be far better off to use a unique private use code for each missing item. That way you don't have to re-analyse each piece of content having "mis" on it. 

It may be possible that such a thing is used interally, but not
sent out over the Internet, i.e. that "mis" is used on the Internet.

Regards,    Martin.

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list