Re: âReshat Sabiq's requests for two Tatar orthographic variants

[CE Whitehead]

>
>I support the addition of a single subtag for New Turkic Alphabet, or 
>whatever it is generically called, using any syntactically valid subtag 
>value that is acceptable to ReÅŸat.
>
>Whatever happened to ReÅŸat's other proposal for "iqtelif" 
>(İdíl-Ural-Qırım Tatar Elifbası)?  It's been so long that I don't 
>remember what the consensus was, if any.
>
It sounds fine if there are no political issues with the different 
linguistic groups that will be included in the subtag.
>--
>Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
>http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
>http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
>http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
Hopefully we will hear from Reshat soon!

Thanks.

--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Want a degree but can't afford to quit? Top school degrees online - in as 
fast as 1 year 
http://forms.nextag.com/goto.jsp?url=/serv/main/buyer/education.jsp?doSearch=n&tm=y&search=education_text_links_88_h288c&s=4079&p=5116