countries & orthographies (RE: ISO 639 name change: Songhai
dewell at adelphia.net
Mon Feb 12 08:57:52 CET 2007
Don Osborn <dzo at bisharat dot net> wrote:
> Thanks, John, Doug. The main thing I'm thinking about is flexibility
> in use of ISO-639 codes. So, "be able to code" sounds great. Fula
> (Fulfulde/Pulaar/Pular) is perhaps an extreme case, but the general
> issues I brought up are not unique to that tongue.
I have to admit to a bit of concern over the word "flexibility" in this
context. Often when someone calls for us to be more "flexible" in our
use of standard codes, it comes down to inventing our own code elements
that look like they belong to the standard but don't, or second-guessing
the work of the experts who have assembled the standards. Lately we
have seen new and creative interpretations of "macrolanguage" which
don't square with the definition of that term according to ISO 639-3/RA,
which invented it. Before that, we were asked to register 2-letter
region subtags that have never been assigned in ISO 3166-1.
I'm reminded of a manager I once worked for who made a change in our
software that was intended to make it more "flexible" for the user,
without bothering to find out that the additional "flexibility" was a
violation of Federal regulations.
In your previous post, you mentioned the possibility of finer or coarser
language distinctions that might apply in different circumstances. I'd
be interested to know how you feel this could be captured in language
tags without appearing to usurp the role of the various ISO 639 RAs that
work on this professionally. I'm concerned that creating our own
pseudo-"macrolanguage" groupings might thrust us into a role for which
we are not qualified, especially if we eventually incorporate ISO 639-6
which will also define multiple levels of relationships between
languages, but more authoritatively.
You mentioned "an orthography for ff-SN+GM+GN+ML+BF+BJ+NE+NG+CM (plus a
few others)." I suppose you're aware that the subtag 011 ("Western
Africa") is available and the tag "ff-011" might adequately define such
a standardized orthography for Fulah. The macrogeographical subtags
(based on UN M.49) were added to BCP 47 to cover exactly this type of
"regional but multinational" variety.
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages