ISO 3166-2 (was: Re: Scottish English)
dewell at roadrunner.com
Mon Aug 27 02:09:01 CEST 2007
Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:
> I agree with you that the syntax couldn't be incorporated directly,
> but we could work around it (not in this group, but in the LTRU
> group). For example, we could say that variants of the form SUBxxxxx
> with a prefix containing a region code were reserved for ISO 3166-2
> codes. The key issues are relevance, suitability, and stability.
We could do this in LTRU, it is true, but I sincerely hope we don't.
It's an ugly hack to get around the syntactical problem, and does
nothing to solve the stability and free-availability problems.
Doug Ewell · Fullerton, California, USA · RFC 4645 · UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages