petercon at microsoft.com
Wed Aug 22 05:47:14 CEST 2007
Perhaps not today.
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Addison Phillips
Cc: IETF Languages Discussion; ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: Scottish English
I share Addison's concerns with using the 3166-2 codes. Many of these will be redundant with the ISO 639-3 codes, though this one is not.
Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo-inc.com>
Sent by: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
08/21/2007 10:34 AM
Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org>
Re: Scottish English
Michael Everson wrote:
> In ISO 3166-2 SCT means Scotland. This is superior to M.49, at least.
However, it is not permitted for registration. The shortest variant is 4
characters (if it starts with a digit) or 5 (if with a letter). We can't
register ISO 3166-2 codes anyway: they would conflict with extlang.
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG
Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages