be-tarask

[CE Whitehead]

Doug Ewell  dewell at adelphia.net :
>Comments: The subtag represents Branislau Taraskievic's Belarusian 
>orthography as published in "Bielaruski klasycny pravapis" by Juras 
>Buslakou, Vincuk Viacorka, Zmicier Sanko, and Zmicier Sauka (Vilnia-Miensk 
>2005).

seems o.k. to me!

(in spite of the criticism [see below],
as I understand it the book is listed
because everyone still knows the language by the name Tarask  . . .
and also by the name "classic" orthography or "classical" orthography;

but it's no problem [as I understand things]
to change the comments field
to say, instead of,
". . . orthography as published in . . . "

"orthography, originally catalogued in . . . "

If of course Jaska wants to make the change???)

--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
* * *

Lars Aronsson lars at aronsson.se
>The above post from Ihar is the first time I see that the 2005 version 
>would be "VERY different" from the 1929 version.  Does that mean somebody 
>will need to register a new subtag for the 1929 version, to tell it apart 
>from the 2005 version?  Are there different newspapers printed in these two 
>sub-sub-versions of Belarusian?  In the light of this, was it perhaps a 
>mistake to use the name of the 1918-1929 author, Mr. Taraskievich, as the 
>basis for the subtag for the 2005 version of the language?

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t quit your job – Take Classes Online and Earn your Degree in 1 year. 
Start Today! 
http://www.classesusa.com/clickcount.cfm?id=866146&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.classesusa.com%2Ffeaturedschools%2Fonlinedegreesmp%2Fform-dyn1.html%3Fsplovr%3D866144