be-tarask
Michael Everson
everson at evertype.com
Mon Apr 23 14:09:16 CEST 2007
Since you cannot agree about this I STRONGLY favour Doug's
suggestion. Doug, please delete the Comments line, since the
"classical" designation turned out to be controversial and the rest
is a duplication of the Description.
What you WANT is -tarask, and if you want to argue about "classic"
you are just delaying getting that.
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list