be-tarask

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Mon Apr 23 14:09:16 CEST 2007


Since you cannot agree about this I STRONGLY favour Doug's 
suggestion. Doug, please  delete the Comments line, since the 
"classical" designation turned out to be controversial and the rest 
is a duplication of the Description.

What you WANT is -tarask, and if you want to argue about "classic" 
you are just delaying getting that.
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list