policy wrt politics (was RE: be-tarask language subtag
registration form)
Doug Ewell
dewell at adelphia.net
Mon Apr 2 03:44:18 CEST 2007
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> We must wait two weeks - that's procedure established in the RFC that
> created this process in the first place. I have long contended that at
> the end of two weeks some action must always be taken: approve the
> request, deny the request or extend discussion for a new two-week
> period. IMO, extending to a new two-week period should only happen
> when clear and obtainable progress toward a decision can be achieved.
> I do not think extensions just so we can carry on discussions is a
> good idea. If there is specific information that is needed before a
> decision can be made, then at the end of two weeks the request should,
> IMO, be denied with an explanation of what is needed.
A big Plus One to that.
--
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list