policy wrt politics (was RE: be-tarask language subtag
dewell at adelphia.net
Mon Apr 2 03:44:18 CEST 2007
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> We must wait two weeks - that's procedure established in the RFC that
> created this process in the first place. I have long contended that at
> the end of two weeks some action must always be taken: approve the
> request, deny the request or extend discussion for a new two-week
> period. IMO, extending to a new two-week period should only happen
> when clear and obtainable progress toward a decision can be achieved.
> I do not think extensions just so we can carry on discussions is a
> good idea. If there is specific information that is needed before a
> decision can be made, then at the end of two weeks the request should,
> IMO, be denied with an explanation of what is needed.
A big Plus One to that.
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages