Suppress-Script candidates (was: Re: frr, fy, ngo, tt)

[Doug Ewell]

Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote:

> Here's a list of 67 differences between LTRU and CLDR 1.4
>
> Lines where LTRU has no script and CLDR more than one are
> most probably sane, but anything else should be checked:

Lines where LTRU has no script and CLDR has one are not something we 
need to spend a great amount of time worrying about, unless there is a 
genuine concern that people are going to start writing, say, 
"ig-Latn-NG" and it won't match with "ig-NG".

The ones where LTRU has one and CLDR has more than one are more 
troubling to me, because it indicates we may have added a 
Suppress-Script where we shouldn't have:

> lang mo  ltru Latn cldr Cyrl Latn
> lang ms  ltru Latn cldr Arab Latn
> lang pa  ltru Guru cldr Arab Guru
> lang tr  ltru Latn cldr Arab Latn

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages