LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Uralic Phonetic Alphabet
Debbie Garside
debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Tue Nov 28 11:08:15 CET 2006
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: 28 November 2006 08:00
> To: ietf-languages at iana.org
> Subject: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM: Uralic
> Phonetic Alphabet
>
> Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
>
> > Type: variant
> > Subtag: fonupa
> > Description: Uralic Phonetic Alphabet
>
> and
>
> > Type: variant
> > Subtag: fonipa
> > Description: International Phonetic Alphabet
>
> I support both of these proposed subtags, and will support
> other proposed variant subtags of the form "fonXXX" that
> systematically represent phonetic transcription systems.
>
> This is the right solution. We have expended a lot of effort
> and words trying to find a way to tag phonetic content
> (primarily IPA) and most solutions involve an ISO 15924
> registration which is unlikely to happen, and/or a change in
> the RFC 4646 syntax which would be completely unjustified.
> Processes that could be expected to recognize a "Latp"
> script subtag and act accordingly can just as easily be made
> to recognize a "fonipa" variant subtag and act accordingly.
>
> This struggle over IPA and friends has taken center stage
> over other discussion on this list, and has distracted
> valuable attention from the business of revising RFC 4646.
> Please, let's agree on this approach and move on.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
>
>
>
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list