[Ltru] LTRU progress and ISO 639-6 (was WiktionaryZ
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Tue Nov 14 02:54:33 CET 2006
At 07:20 06/11/14, Debbie Garside wrote:
>> > Can you send me details of the project?
>Ah! So you really mean LTRU!
>What exactly is going on with LTRU. There seems to be no progress being
>made at all.
For several weeks before an IETF meeting, draft submission is closed.
>What has happened to issue tracker. How do we find out what
>the issues are and in what state of discussion they are in?
I haven't officially tracked any issues, because they are still
too much in flux.
>Randy, Martin, I would really appreciate it if we could have a list of the
>issues and possible solutions. Or have I missed something? Are RFC4645/6bis
>on track without me realising?
I think there are several areas of issues. Doug has sent a list
that he need resolved for his next draft a few days ago.
>What are the timescales that we are now working to? When can we expect the
>next draft? Questions, questions! And why, when it is so relevant to all
>the variants currently under discussion
>(written/spoken/signed/orthographies/writing systems etc) is ISO 639-6 not
I think one reason is that most people do not know very much about
639-6. If you don't mind, could you send a short summary of how
639-6 addresses things such as written/spoken/signed/orthographies/writing
systems etc? With concrete examples, indicating whether these are
currently in the draft or are hypothetical. I think that would help
the WG to have a good disucussion.
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the Ietf-languages