Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes

Debbie Garside debbie at
Thu Mar 23 23:33:29 CET 2006

That's fair enough.

However, I would point out that the problem is not in getting notifications.

In order to get GG JE and IM registered for use (as well as their alpha3
equivalents) as was called for on this list a few months ago, 4 Governments
were involved in the creation and sanctioning of an eleven page document
supporting the application! Plus two Standards bodies involved in delivering
the goods! Just a small feat as Frank says ;-)

Best regards

Debbie Garside

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: 23 March 2006 21:58
> To: ietf-languages at
> Subject: Re: Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes
> Debbie Garside <debbie at ictmarketing dot co dot uk> wrote:
> > I think it would be a good idea for this group to appoint liaison with
> > each standard the RFC invokes.
> >
> > I will happily take on the role for ISO 3166-1 should you so wish (and
> > ISO CD 639-6 of course ;-)).
> I don't actively oppose the "official liaison" approach.  At present, a
> few individuals on this list can be counted on for this, but Madison did
> write something about enlightened statesmen not always being at the
> helm.
> Let's wait and see if we have any problems, and if a more formal
> approach turns out to be necessary, perhaps we can consider it for RFC
> 3066ter.  So far we've succeeded in getting quick notification for 2 out
> of 2 standards changes since the initial registry was posted.
> --
> Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California, USA
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list