Process Enhancement

Mark Davis mark.davis at
Tue Mar 21 16:57:17 CET 2006

There is nothing in the rules that says that we can't have a beta page, 
and nothing that says that IANA can't double check what they produce 
against that page, even if they follow the rules to the letter.


Addison Phillips wrote:
> This is suggested for a future 3066ter. For the immediate future the process is exactly as described in 3066bis (submission of individual records by the LSR to IANA).
> Addison
> Addison Phillips
> Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature. 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-languages-bounces at [mailto:ietf-languages-
>> bounces at] On Behalf Of Ned Freed
>> Sent: 2006年3月20日 16:10
>> To: Doug Ewell
>> Cc: ietf-languages at
>> Subject: Re: Process Enhancement
>> While I have no problem with this proposal being implemented, I think
>> there
>> is basically no chance of it happening without incorporating it into the
>> LTRU registration document.
>> IANA is very careful to follow the procedures spelled out in the various
>> specifications the IETF produces and has historically been quite reluctant
>> to
>> deviate from them in even minor ways. (And I have to say I see this as a
>> Very
>> Good Thing in general.) And this proposal restructures the process fairly
>> significantly.
>> 				Ned
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list