Language subtag modification request: frr Suppres-Script Latn
kentk at cs.chalmers.se
Sat Mar 11 19:20:23 CET 2006
Doug Ewell wrote:
> I hadn't thought of that. Does anyone else agree that when a
> change in
> the Description field is made, based on a change in the corresponding
> ISO standard, it would be useful to add a Comments field
> indicating the
> previous name? Would this help users? Comments invited.
Yes in this case, as this actually changes (slightly) the meaning of "fy".
If it were just (say) a spell correction, there might not be a reason to
formally register a comment about that.
Further, in this case I would guess that one wanted to avoid the
"no-nb-nn" problem yet again. Speaking of which, some kind of
resolution on the use of (older) "no" vs. (newer) "nb" and "nn" should
be made for the language subtag registry.
More information about the Ietf-languages