[Ltru] Re: Pointers from registry to documentation
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Thu Jun 29 03:25:53 CEST 2006
Addison Phillips scripsit:
> However, my sense is that file-level comments will not be added during
> an RFC 3066ter effort, in an effort to do as little as possible to
> the file format. It might be possible to ease the restriction on the
> File-Date so that it can contain Comments fields. Most record-jar
> processors are already capable of handling multiple field records
> anyway...
My objection to file-level comments is that it's not clear what
record they are in, and since we maintain the file record by record,
they would need a unique mechanism for change control.
This objection wouldn't apply to Comment: entries in the File-Date
record, though, and I'd be in favor of that.
--
They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan
with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
wound. If they had succeeded, you would
become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord. --Gandalf
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list