[Ltru] Charter Discussion
dewell at adelphia.net
Tue Jun 6 16:07:51 CEST 2006
Debbie Garside <debbie at ictmarketing dot co dot uk> wrote:
> You may be interested to know that no 639-6 alpha4 representation will
> be allocated to a linguistic entity that already has a 639-3 alpha3
That is a dramatic step toward eliminating my concerns -- and probably
those of others as well -- that 639-6 couldn't be made to work with a
successor to RFC 3066bis.
I'll still be interested to see how we would go about defining
equivalences between a language-script combination, or a language-region
combination, and a unitary 639-6 code element that means the same thing.
Fullerton, California, USA
More information about the Ietf-languages