Sign languages
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Sun Feb 26 07:35:01 CET 2006
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> >Now we can either treat sgn-US and the 20 other registered tags as sui
> >generis, or we can extend the pattern to the other national-scope sign
> >languages, and treat the "minority" sign languages differently, either
> >as sgn-xxx or as just xxx. I proposed the former.
>
> I thought you had proposed the latter. I'm glad I misunderstood.
Oops. What I propose is actually the second of the three possibilities
mentioned: sgn-XX for national sign languages, sgn-yyy for non-national
ones.
--
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org www.ap.org www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today.
--Specht v. Netscape
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list