Sign languages

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Sun Feb 26 07:35:01 CET 2006


Doug Ewell scripsit:

> >Now we can either treat sgn-US and the 20 other registered tags as sui
> >generis, or we can extend the pattern to the other national-scope sign
> >languages, and treat the "minority" sign languages differently, either
> >as sgn-xxx or as just xxx.  I proposed the former.
> 
> I thought you had proposed the latter.  I'm glad I misunderstood.

Oops.  What I propose is actually the second of the three possibilities
mentioned: sgn-XX for national sign languages, sgn-yyy for non-national
ones.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan at ccil.org  www.ap.org  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. 
       --Specht v. Netscape


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list