Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c

[CE Whitehead]

Hi!

">And to that degree, fr-1500s probably makes as much sense as fr-CA
>in terms
>of defining a reasonably meaningful language-tag, and far more useful than
>the perfectly legal en-Cyrl-AQ."

1500s and 1600s are possible solutions for the name of the tag, better still 
than 16thc and 17thc perhaps??? but since 1500s is not a registered subtag 
and neither is 1600s, I think I need to register these, or some similarly 
named tags

16esiecl
17esiecl?

Which do people like better?

1500s and 1600s

or 16esiecl and 17siecl

?

Thanks.

--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Visit MSN Holiday Challenge for your chance to win up to $50,000 in Holiday 
cash from MSN today!  
http://www.msnholidaychallenge.com/index.aspx?ocid=tagline&locale=en-us