Request for variant subtag fr 16th-c 17th-c Resubmitted!

[Michael Everson]

At 21:56 +0100 2006-12-13, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>if you want to specify the same language as Academie Francaise's 
>1694 dictionary, I think the subtag "af1694" would be less prone to 
>stimulating debate.

Just 1694 would be more or less the same as the German subtags, but I 
don't mind.
-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com