Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes
randy_presuhn at mindspring.com
Sat Apr 1 00:15:56 CEST 2006
> From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk>
> To: "'Addison Phillips'" <addison at yahoo-inc.com>; <lucp at skopos.be>; "'IETF Languages Discussion'" <ietf-languages at iana.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:43 PM
> Subject: RE: Guernsey Jersey and Isle of Man ISO 3166-1 Codes
> I would like to revise the comment to be more informative (see my previous
> mail) the initial comment was devised to have as little impact, whilst still
> being informative, as possible. In other words, make it small and people
> may not object ;-)
> Not knowing the history of this I cannot comment other than to say maybe it
> is time to set a precedent to record historical changes to code where the
> issuing body fails to do so. That is all I am proposing here.
I think this would be going to far.
I can understand adding a comment when the absence of the comment might
cause someone to mis-tag data. I don't see how that is the case in this instance.
More information about the Ietf-languages