Tagging of silent films
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Wed Sep 28 22:13:15 CEST 2005
Peter Constable wrote:
>> Personally, I'd be all for deprecating the tag 'und' and
>> replacing it with 'xxx' (a shorthand combination widely
>> recognised across this planet as indicating
>> 'unknown/blank/yet to be filled in').
> And also as widely recognized as indicating either 'poison'
> or 'sexually-explicit content'.
Yes, "xxx" is a bad idea, not speaking about a potential sTLD.
While "und" was a poor choice, e.g. it's not "UNDefined", to
replace it now could make it worse. I started to think about
"nnn" (derived from latin NN). But "nnn" would be confused
with "nn" (the former "no-nyn"), this could upset Harald. :-)
More information about the Ietf-languages