Scottish English

[JFC (Jefsey) Morfin]

At 00:05 22/10/2005, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>You are probably right, but I think that ISO 31&&-2 looks like the 
>most promising spec to use for further qualifying a territory, eg to specify
>a dialect.

May I ask you a silly question?
In which way would a territory specify (I suppose you want to say 
qualify?) a dialect?
Weather, mine, superficy, location, price, etc. OK, but a dialect?

Would it not be more its gramar, semantic, dictionary, etc. and may 
be what the people speaking it say they speak on one has explained 
them the possible confusion with other languages names?
jfc