draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications,
"stability", and extensions
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Wed Jan 5 15:01:46 CET 2005
ned.freed at mrochek.com scripsit:
> > Finding country codes is straightforward: any non-initial subtag of
> > two letters (not appearing to the right of "x-" or "-x-") is a country
> > code. This is true in RFC 1766, RFC 3066, and the current draft.
> On the contrary, in RFC 3066 the rule is "any 2 letter value that
> appears as the second subtag is a country code". The rule in the new
> draft is either the formulation you give above or "any 2 letter value
> that appears as a subtag after the initial subtag and some number of
> 3 and 4 letter subtags".
I didn't state it as a rule, but as true. Every non-initial 2-letter
tag in RFC 3066 is a country code; the same is true in the draft.
(A private correspondent notes that the reference to "-x-" should
in fact be a reference to any singleton, though "-x-" and "i-" are
the only singletons currently usable.)
> Just because something doesn't necessarily do something doesn't mean it
> never does it.
It does mean it can't be counted on in the general case.
> Well, maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I see nothing in RFC
3066 that > qualifies as a description of a matching algorithm.
Section 2.5 (2.4.1 in the draft) states the matching rule in a succinct
fashion. Everything in 2.4.2 is a non-normative elaboration of this.
John Cowan www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan at reutershealth.com
'Tis the Linux rebellion / Let coders take their place,
The Linux-nationale / Shall Microsoft outpace,
We can write better programs / Our CPUs won't stall,
So raise the penguin banner of / The Linux-nationale. --Greg Baker
More information about the Ietf-languages