Generic variant subtags in RFC 3066bis
mgunn at egt.ie
Tue Apr 19 13:12:07 CEST 2005
Absolutely true (on both counts).
Scríobh Caoimhin O Donnaile:
> > When the RFC 3066bis registry is up and running, I intend to propose
> > some highly generic variant subtags which may be used with many
> > languages. Some examples that come to mind are -northern, -southern,
> > -eastern, -western, and -central for geographical dialects; -ancient
> > and -middle for earlier versions of languages (-old being too short);
> > and -highreg, -midreg, and -lowreg for sociolinguistic registers.
> Aren't such terms highly specific to each language, subject to the
> conventions of scholarship within that language, and non-orthogonal?
> E.g. "Middle Irish" is 900-1200 roughly, whereas "Middle English"
> is 1100-1500. "Clasical Irish" is 1200-1650, whereas "Classical Latin"
> is much earlier(!), and the term "Classical English" is not normally
> used at all.
Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an
Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.
* mgunn at egt.ie * eamonn at egt.ie *
More information about the Ietf-languages