Linguasphere -- An appeal for clarity
jcowan at reutershealth.com
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Fri Jun 4 19:14:12 CEST 2004
Misha Wolf scripsit:
> It is about language identification so it clearly overlaps our
> domain of interest. If it were a Good Thing but unsuited for
> eg "Accept-Language" and "xml:lang" then it would be perfectly
> fine for it to be adopted as an ISO standard and for some other
> RFC (or other spec) to define how it is to be used, eg in XML,
> for example via linguasphere:lang="abcd".
I can't agree with you there. If Linguasphere becomes ISO 639-6 (as
Ethnologue is becoming ISO 639-3, not without changes), then there will
be to say the least pressures to accept 639-6 codes in some successor
to RFC 3066. This is not about a whole separate ISO standard, it is about
a different part to the existing ISO standard that RFC 3066 is already
making use of. Its overall suitability has to be discussed here.
--
John Cowan jcowan at reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam.
Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam.
--Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank You
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list