Registered sgn-* tags

Michael Everson everson at
Mon Jul 12 22:42:46 CEST 2004

At 13:38 -0700 2004-07-12, Peter Constable wrote:

>"sgn" is not at all like a script. Encoding 'Sign' in ISO 15924 
>would be a *huge* mistake. I repeat, a *huge* mistake.

Encoding "Sign" in ISO 15924 would be a perfectly valid way of 
representing Sutton SignWriting, which is a script.
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list