Registered sgn-* tags
everson at evertype.com
Mon Jul 12 22:42:46 CEST 2004
At 13:38 -0700 2004-07-12, Peter Constable wrote:
>"sgn" is not at all like a script. Encoding 'Sign' in ISO 15924
>would be a *huge* mistake. I repeat, a *huge* mistake.
Encoding "Sign" in ISO 15924 would be a perfectly valid way of
representing Sutton SignWriting, which is a script.
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages