Language Identifier List up for comments
dewell at adelphia.net
Fri Dec 17 06:50:34 CET 2004
Mark Davis <mark dot davis at jtcsv dot com> wrote:
> John's description was "plausible". That is a much broader criterion
> than either current usage or best practices. On that account, all of
> the following qualify, and should be included.
>> zh-CN, zh-HK, zh-MO, zh-SG, zh-TW,
>> zh-Hans, zh-Hans-CN, zh-Hans-SG,
>> zh-Hant, zh-Hant-HK, zh-Hant-MO, zh-Hant-TW
As John pointed out, though, we can't conformantly use any tags of the
form language-script-region until RFC 3066bis is approved. So you have
to remove zh-Hans-CN and friends for now.
More information about the Ietf-languages