the new registry -- possible future directions

[Doug Ewell]

Lee Gillam <l dot gillam at eim dot surrey dot ac dot uk> wrote:

> Happy reading. I suggest starting at numbered page 27 - the document
> might seem shorter.
>
> http://metadata-stds.org/11179-3/ISO-IEC_11179-3_2003_IS_E.pdf

1.  Thank you.

2.  Whoa.  108 pages, and that's just Part 3.  I'm thinking this might
be overkill for the language subtag registry -- not just the length, but
the amount of detail and level of abstraction -- but I'll print it out
and see if I can find some time to grok it.

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California
 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/