Scripts2 at sesame.demon.co.uk
Sat May 31 09:30:24 CEST 2003
Subtag syntax arose out of various postings
Re: en-GB-oxford LANGUAGE TAG REGISTRATION FORM.
I thought that I had picked up this idea of
ll-cc-anything for "written language tags" and
ll-anything for "spoken language tags"
in one or two postings.
I agree with Peter that not everybody said this.
Nevertheless, is that idea (or something like it) worth exploring?
We are certainly likely to need some ways of differentiating the two
in subtag syntax, for some purposes, to avoid ambiguity,
as two different meanings of what might be called "Oxford English"
(written and spoken forms) already show.
In message <OFFDFECD09.818C66F2-ON86256D36.007ABC0E-86256D36.007B1804 at sil.org> Peter_Constable at sil.org writes:
> John Clews wrote on 05/30/2003 03:58:46 PM:
> > The use of -us, -en, -au subtags (before -oed) would appear to
> > indicate that this relates to written language, and not do a spoken
> > form.
> Not a priori.
> > spinoffs), while en-oed or en-oxford would relate to a spoken form
> > (as in "Oxford English on the BBC")
> If that's how they're defined when (assuming if) registered, but at present
> nothing requires that.
> > At least that's the consensus that I picked up.
> I must have missed that thread.
> > ll-cc-anything for "written language tags" and
> I thought that the distinctions between es-MX, es-AR, es-CO etc. were
> primarily dialectal (esp. vocab), whether for audio or text data.
> - Peter
Keytempo Limited (Information Management),
8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
Tel: +44 1423 888 432
mobile: +44 7766 711 395
Email: Scripts2 at sesame.demon.co.uk
Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes
More information about the Ietf-languages