everson at evertype.com
Wed May 28 21:30:40 CEST 2003
At 15:26 -0400 2003-05-28, John Cowan wrote:
>> I mean, I'd guess you wouldn't have a problem with, say, en-latn-boont?
>No, I still prefer en-boont-latn. En-boont is syntactically English, but
>lexically it's very different. Look again at the two samples I posted
>back when en-boont was registered:
Does this mean that we still don't have consensus on the syntax of these tags?
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages