en-GB-oxford LANGUAGE TAG REGISTRATION FORM
John Clews
Scripts2 at keytempo.com
Sat Jun 21 20:52:22 CEST 2003
Dear Michael
In message <p05200a02bb1a37913eb1@[195.218.107.35]> you wrote:
> At 16:11 +0000 2003-06-20, John Clews wrote:
> >I _much_ prefer en-oed.
> >
> >It's the same level as en-scouse, and just as valid.
>
> I think I disagree. -oed is a variety of the kind of English marked
> by en-GB, in specific software environments.
Ah, if it's use is in specific software environments, that may be
fair enough.
> The subsubtag modifies the subtag. Scouse is a dialect of English.
Out of interest, has en-scouse ever been used in specific software
environments?
I'd be interested to see what use has been made of it, if anybody can
provide examples.
This is not a facetious question: I don't dispute that Scouse is a
dialect of English, nor that there was a need for a tag for it.
I'd just be interested to see what use has been made of it,
once allocated.
I look forward with interest to any replies
Best wishes
John Clews
--
John Clews,
Keytempo Limited (Information Management),
8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG
Tel: +44 1423 888 432
mobile: +44 7766 711 395
Email: Scripts2 at sesame.demon.co.uk
Web: http://www.keytempo.com
Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization;
Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list