Scientific Latin and "la"
duerst at w3.org
Mon Feb 3 10:47:36 CET 2003
At 15:11 03/02/03 +0000, Michael Everson wrote:
>At 13:34 +0000 2003-02-03, Jon Hanna wrote:
>>The question remains though, do people think scientific Latin this is "la",
>>or is it whatever language surrounds it?
Another answer is 'tag it as whater you think works best for you'.
>It's Latin. It has Latin inflections (Ferocactus wislizenii), though
>horrid things like nodanotherwon may occur due to a lack of Latin and
>initiative among modern scientists (aliusalius would have been better!).
>Tag it as Latin, and use a big Latin user dictionary to do your spell
>checking. That would be my advice.
>Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
>Ietf-languages mailing list
>Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages