Reordering of items... [was RE: LANGUAGE TAG
duerst at w3.org
Thu Apr 10 19:43:33 CEST 2003
At 23:34 03/04/10 +0100, Michael Everson wrote:
>If there are 5000 years of Traditional Chinese, and less than 100 of
>Simplified, why isn't Hani the default and Hans to be applied where necessary?
Most probably more material has been published in the last
50 or so years in simplified than before in traditional.
More information about the Ietf-languages