[Fwd]: Response to Mark's message]
everson at evertype.com
Thu Apr 10 10:01:41 CEST 2003
At 16:36 -0700 2003-04-09, Mark Davis wrote:
>Well, my vote is for encoding the two script variants Hans/Hant, on the
>pattern of Latn/Latg/Latf. Just as with Latn, the script value Hann does not
>discriminate between Hans and Hant. If further script variants of Hann are
>needed in the future, they could be considered at that time.
But Latn is used by itself. Will Hani be used for anything if Hans
and Hant are there?
Of course en doesn't need Latn, as it's the default. en-Runr one
might need. So maybe only zh-Hans and zh-Hant (plus something for
Singapore) will be used and zh by itself won't be used much.
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages