[Fwd]: Response to Mark's message]
everson at evertype.com
Wed Apr 9 18:06:28 CEST 2003
At 10:48 -0500 2003-04-09, Peter_Constable at sil.org wrote:
>I, for one, do not think that RFC3066 should be changed to deal with
>It *should* be changed to accommodate distinctions in things like
>writing system/orthographies/spelling conventions as well as language, but
I completely agree.
>Such an extended RFC3066 would be of use for locale identification
>since language and text-related distinctions are relevant for
>locales, but locales go beyond the scope of what RFC3066 has been
>and should be intended to deal with.
I completely and entirely agree.
And I'm 15924 registrar and 3066 language tag reviewer. Heh heh heh. :-)
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Ietf-languages