Script codes in RFC 3066

John Cowan jcowan at
Wed Apr 9 10:16:59 CEST 2003

Caoimhin O Donnaile scripsit:

> I think that language codes should be "atomic", not hierarchic,

In general you are right.  But we can't escape so easily from ISO 639-1/-2,
because so many systems already understand them.  Saying cpf-hat for
Haitian Creole French gives systems that only understand "cpf" at least
some clue.

John Cowan  jcowan at
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list