Proposal: Language code "de-DE-trad"
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:51:31 +0100
On 19 Feb 02, at 10:36, Francois Yergeau wrote:
> Martin Duerst wrote:
> > At 19:36 02/02/18 -0800, Mark Davis wrote:
> > >As to why the Americans would be resistant to making a change to
> > >metric, with all of the logical advantages, just think about it for a
> > >few centiseconds.
> > Maybe that should be centiminutes? :-)
I don't think so, since second is the basic SI unit of time, while
centiminutes as 0.6s look a bit awkward... let's say, for a few seconds,
> It should clearly be in micro-fortnights (µf).
Well, the micro-fortnight is a well documented unit of time, see jargon file.
But at this opportunity, I'd like to mention the nanocentury.
For something completely different...
What can I do to further the de-DE-trad, de-DE-1996 and the other
Are there open questions, formal issues, procedures?
I don't want to distract from the centiminutes and the metric vs. other
systems, but I am still interested in the issue of tagging the lately
deformed, err, reformed german orthography and its traditional