Standardizing on IDNA 2003 in the URL Standard

Anne van Kesteren annevk at
Fri Jan 31 00:08:06 CET 2014

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜)
<jungshik at> wrote:
> ICU's IDNA 2003 implementation just does that. Before Chrome switched to UTS
> 46 a few milestones ago, that's what's used by Chrome.
> And, Safari is likely to still use that (well, it depends on Mac OS X's
> network API so that its behavior may differ on different OS X/iOS's).

Earlier in this thread I provided a test case that shows Safari
handles code points added after Unicode 3.2 just fine. Pretty sure the
same was true for Chrome when I tested it. Hard to verify now.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list