"This case isn't the important one" (was Re: Visually confusable characters (8))

Shawn Steele Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com
Mon Aug 11 21:56:01 CEST 2014

> No, not quite; this is exactly the problem.  While I accept and believe I understand Unicode's decision that these are formally non-equivalent, I think that for IDNA purposes that may not be good.

What is IDNA's purpose here?

More information about the Idna-update mailing list